Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:04:19 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de> Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ioquake3 support more platforms Message-ID: <4B2D31C3.10108@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4B2CEA57.5050904@bsdforen.de> References: <4B2A52DB.5020602@bsdforen.de> <20091218065728.GC29158@lonesome.com> <4B2B681A.1090908@bsdforen.de> <4B2C888A.6000006@FreeBSD.org> <4B2CEA57.5050904@bsdforen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dominic Fandrey wrote: > But this is not the case we're talking about (I explained the process > in sufficient detail, I think). I take an up to date snapshot, apply my > patch set, make a couple of test builds and runs, update the patch set > until everything works as expected. Than I wrap the whole thing (SVN > snapshot and my patches) up in a tar.gz and upload it to an ftp server. Well then I misunderstood what was proposed, and I apologize for that. What you described is supported, and some ports are already doing it. Doug -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B2D31C3.10108>