Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 11:21:36 +0300 From: "Alexander V. Ribchansky" <shurik@zk.informjust.ua> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd 8.0 kmem map too small Message-ID: <4BED0810.10508@zk.informjust.ua> In-Reply-To: <20100511223813.GB3044@garage.freebsd.pl> References: <4BE95F1F.5090009@zk.informjust.ua> <20100511223813.GB3044@garage.freebsd.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
12.05.2010 01:38, Pawel Jakub Dawidek пишет: > -skip- > Could you try the following patch without disabling UMA? > > http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/vfs_subr.c.7.patch > > It works quite well for me. > > Also we still don't have back-pressure mechanism when arc_meta_limit is > exceeded. OpenSolaris frees namecache entires then and we currently do > nothing. I'll experiment with a bit and let you know if the patch above > doesn't fix your problem still. > OOps, I do it again! ;) So after several hard days my STABLE gone away again. With your patch and UMA enabled. Wired constantly grow, last time I see it, it was about 940M As Wired grom, perfomance become terrible, buildworld take about 4 hours on Core2quadro.. So my wery IMHO (please don't kill me for it) that UMA allocation on i386 is unusable, correct me if I'm wrong. -- AVR39-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4BED0810.10508>