Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:19:41 -0400 From: "Brian A. Seklecki (CFI NOC)" <seklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us> To: Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de> Cc: freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Brandon Gooch <jamesbrandongooch@gmail.com>, Sean McAfee <smcafee@collaborativefusion.com>, Steve Polyack <korvus@comcast.net>, Michael Tuexen <tuexen@freebsd.org>, Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com>, bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com, Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> Subject: Re: em(4) duplex problems with 82541EI on RELENG_8, -CURRENT on PowerEdge 1850 Message-ID: <4C4DB59D.6020204@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <4C447684.7010308@omnilan.de> References: <1275419919.30057.50.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> <20100601193733.GA44816@icarus.home.lan> <AANLkTilAiGMfh7Jo0aJk4aEYXnPOvJvz93Xl3fpsxGQR@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTik2uhWo1MGbEfvZGfSiLpx5Y-m9FpA1UKn3SaTa@mail.gmail.com> <4C3CBC1E.9030106@omnilan.de> <1279212377.31311.144.camel@soundwave> <1279212602.31311.151.camel@soundwave> <84875A93-3851-476E-8F2E-A7008CA6BD5C@FreeBSD.org> <4C3F49E8.9090201@comcast.net> <AANLkTilXYsE9SID4qeAdn_ZhHCWL8xO6dRKaIjNl4gJD@mail.gmail.com> <1279552398.31311.443.camel@soundwave> <4C447684.7010308@omnilan.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7/19/2010 12:00 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> ******************************************/
> -/*$FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/e1000/if_igb.h,v 1.4.2.2.2.1 2010/06/14 02:09:06 kensmith Exp $*/
> +/*$FreeBS
Haralad:
It looks like your patch is identical to the patch RFP'd from HEAD
to branches/stable/8 on 06/18/2010 (aka, SVN r209309?)
This includes the cumulative backport of changes in HEAD from
r208117 all the way to r209259 (but not 209959, which addresses
the TX checksum panic?)
Just to confirm: This fixes the duplex problems for you?
If so, odd -- I coped all of e1000/*.{c.h} from 8/stable/.../e1000/*
on 07/17/2010 into releng/8.1/sys/dev/e1000/* and am still seeing
the duplex problem after a full rebuild.
I've been laboring under the assumption that SVN r209238 fixed
my problem, but it doesn't appear so from my backport testing.
I'll try modifying your patch to include r209259 -> 209959 from
HEAD as well and go from there.
~BAS
PS. Maybe my lurid language has cursed me and I have to make peace
with the universe first. Now, everyone reach under their chairs
and take the 5 dried grams of shrooms I taped there.
Then send in Vanilla Ice.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C4DB59D.6020204>