Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:51:03 +0200
From:      Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de>
To:        bseklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us
Cc:        freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Brandon Gooch <jamesbrandongooch@gmail.com>, Sean McAfee <smcafee@collaborativefusion.com>, Steve Polyack <korvus@comcast.net>, Michael Tuexen <tuexen@freebsd.org>, Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com>, bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com, "Brian A. Seklecki \(CFI NOC\)" <seklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us>, Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com>
Subject:   Re: em(4) duplex problems with 82541EI on RELENG_8, -CURRENT on PowerEdge 1850
Message-ID:  <4C4DD917.3050007@omnilan.de>
In-Reply-To: <4C4DB59D.6020204@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us>
References:  <1275419919.30057.50.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com>		<20100601193733.GA44816@icarus.home.lan>		<AANLkTilAiGMfh7Jo0aJk4aEYXnPOvJvz93Xl3fpsxGQR@mail.gmail.com>		<AANLkTik2uhWo1MGbEfvZGfSiLpx5Y-m9FpA1UKn3SaTa@mail.gmail.com>		<4C3CBC1E.9030106@omnilan.de>	<1279212377.31311.144.camel@soundwave>		<1279212602.31311.151.camel@soundwave>		<84875A93-3851-476E-8F2E-A7008CA6BD5C@FreeBSD.org>		<4C3F49E8.9090201@comcast.net>		<AANLkTilXYsE9SID4qeAdn_ZhHCWL8xO6dRKaIjNl4gJD@mail.gmail.com>	<1279552398.31311.443.camel@soundwave>	<4C447684.7010308@omnilan.de> <4C4DB59D.6020204@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 26.07.2010 18:19, Brian A. Seklecki (CFI NOC) wrote:
> On 7/19/2010 12:00 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
>> ******************************************/
>> -/*$FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/e1000/if_igb.h,v 1.4.2.2.2.1 2010/06/14
>> 02:09:06 kensmith Exp $*/
>> +/*$FreeBS
> 
> 
> Haralad:
> 
>   It looks like your patch is identical to the patch RFP'd from HEAD
>   to branches/stable/8 on 06/18/2010 (aka, SVN r209309?)
> 
>   This includes the cumulative backport of changes in HEAD from
>   r208117 all the way to r209259 (but not 209959, which addresses
>   the TX checksum panic?)

Looks like I really missed r209259

>   Just to confirm: This fixes the duplex problems for you?

No, I haven't done further tests regarding the duplex problem.

>   If so, odd -- I coped all of e1000/*.{c.h} from 8/stable/.../e1000/*
>   on 07/17/2010 into releng/8.1/sys/dev/e1000/* and am still seeing
>   the duplex problem after a full rebuild.
> 
>   I've been laboring under the assumption that SVN r209238 fixed
>   my problem, but it doesn't appear so from my backport testing.
> 
>   I'll try modifying your patch to include r209259 -> 209959 from
>   HEAD as well and go from there.

Sorry for the hassle, I shouldn't have posted this patch without
verification.

-Harry



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C4DD917.3050007>