Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 16:34:51 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: 849372@gmail.com Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>, Andres Perera <andres.perera@zoho.com> Subject: Re: portmaster and environ from pkg_install tools (was: i keep *trying* to move from portupgrade to portmaster) Message-ID: <4C5C9C1B.5080804@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinwe%2B_NBwLzHHuKbd0d=UeCSzPwjY_Tzhzry=kP@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTinwe%2B_NBwLzHHuKbd0d=UeCSzPwjY_Tzhzry=kP@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/06/2010 16:01, Andres Perera wrote: > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote: >> On 08/06/2010 15:03, Adam Vande More wrote: >> >>> While your in the mood for for taking portmaster suggestions, >> >> I am always in the mood for taking suggestions. :) >> > > On that note, I suggest that portmaster should fallback on PKG_PATH, > which is explained in pkg_add(1), if LOCAL_PACKAGEDIR isn't defined. It uses PACKAGES if LOCAL_PACKAGEDIR is not defined, which is a throwback to the days before package installation support because it uses that location for other things too. Doug -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/ Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. -- Pablo Picasso
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C5C9C1B.5080804>