Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 19 Sep 2010 02:38:28 -0400
From:      jhell <jhell@DataIX.net>
To:        Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de>, perryh@pluto.rain.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Distributed Version Control for ports(7) ( was: Re: autoconf update )
Message-ID:  <4C95AFE4.30608@DataIX.net>
In-Reply-To: <20100918141727.22a81b66@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
References:  <4C91446F.3090202@bsdforen.de> <20100916171744.GA48415@hades.panopticon> <4C927ED0.5050307@bsdforen.de> <86zkvhfhaa.fsf@gmail.com> <4C92C14D.3010005@FreeBSD.org> <4C92F195.5000605@FreeBSD.org> <4C93A107.4070809@DataIX.net> <4c93f602.pzTXVEQ%2B3q2cRA23%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4C94617B.3080702@bsdforen.de> <20100918141727.22a81b66@it.buh.tecnik93.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/18/2010 07:17, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> 
> I'm still to see a concise, clear, precise, listing of advantages that
> switching from CVS would bring us, that would overcome the effort
> needed to do it (committers, users, infrastructure, tools).
> 


1). http://bit.ly/d5UrtN

2). http://www.keltia.net/BSDCan/paper.pdf

3). http://bit.ly/97Y8Xi

4). Because CVS just does not do any of this.

Make your final comparison here:
http://bit.ly/cyQBn8

For the sake of argument can you think of any reason to not switch ?
lets hear those, I'm interested.

-- 

 jhell,v



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C95AFE4.30608>