Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 21:41:48 +0100 From: Ben Laurie <ben@links.org> To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: _LP64 and _ILP32 Message-ID: <4DEA988C.5030003@links.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It turns out that both clang and gcc define _LP64 when used native on amd64. Neither defines _ILP32 on i386 (native or cross-compiled). dt_popc() in cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libdtrace/common/dt_subr.c needs on or the other. clang notices because when _ILP32 is missing there's no return. So ... thoughts?-- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.links.org/ "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DEA988C.5030003>