Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:45:29 -0500 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu> To: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, =?UTF-8?B?Um9tYWluIFRhcnRpw6hyZQ==?= <romain@blogreen.org> Subject: Re: TeXLive Message-ID: <4E92F6F9.4050403@missouri.edu> In-Reply-To: <4E92E3D4.5020700@missouri.edu> References: <BLU0-SMTP2267D68635365B77502657993FC0@phx.gbl> <20111009212024.4a0e443e@silver.nine> <4E925F6A.3080700@missouri.edu> <20111010082927.GA32070@blogreen.org> <CAF6rxgmQkFgeR00hZUvnJ6F65joC=a%2BTw6Zsay4qKnOHnJgraw@mail.gmail.com> <4E92E3D4.5020700@missouri.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/10/11 07:23, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > On 10/10/2011 06:44 AM, Eitan Adler wrote: >> >> Are there any plans on getting these committed to the mainline ports >> tree? I'd be willing to work with you on that. > > I agree with Eitan. I don't see a reason why texlive shouldn't make it > into the mainstream ports. Also, someone might object that it introduces 2000 ports into the print category. But as a counterargument, www and devel have similar numbers of ports.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E92F6F9.4050403>