Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:33:37 +0200 From: "Hartmann, O." <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> To: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>, "portmgr@freebsd.org" <portmgr@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ports on 10.0-CURRENT: r226027 is incorrect fix Message-ID: <4E9356A1.9000503@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <20111010120419.9cfee3e9.stas@FreeBSD.org> References: <20111007230336.GB3051@laptop.levsha.me> <20111007164411.554ac9c0.stas@FreeBSD.org> <CADLo83-3m0L=tvRiasQbroS%2BUwyJF5cU7mBaSpw9pjSnAEn0RQ@mail.gmail.com> <20111010120419.9cfee3e9.stas@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/10/11 21:04, Stanislav Sedov wrote: > On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 18:35:13 +0100 > Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> mentioned: > >> Last I heard, portmgr explicitly disapproved of this fix-- have I missed >> something??? Erwin specifically said not to do it. >> >> Since when can anyone just commit stuff to bsd.port.mk, regardless of its >> location? >> >> This is a bad solution, please revert it or I will when I get back. We're >> going to end up being asked to support it on ports@ otherwise. >> > You certianly missed something, including the rationale behind the portmgr@ > descision of not committing to the ports tree (!) bsd.port.mk. Go find > some useful work to do like deleting old ports or whatever. You might want > to consider deleting all mine ports, as I'm not going to support them anymore > (after you backed out this fix without approval I don't have a working ports > tree anymore on any of my 3 workstations). > Hello? Is there need for this barbarian rude tone? Regards, oh
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E9356A1.9000503>