Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 07:01:49 -0500 From: Michael Scheidell <scheidell@freebsd.org> To: Zhihao Yuan <lichray@gmail.com>, <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: ports/161225: security/pam_fprint: Updates to the last git version Message-ID: <4ED3782D.70408@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <CAGsORuBzukGHHRKokkJgsvDSZjw5ef-EiTjsG7T=dAsAEJ-tGQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <4ED2D061.5080309@freebsd.org> <CAGsORuCNz=qMBhxoqruh-sbNruCMtcSfQ6skNiiChWgvaR7OZg@mail.gmail.com> <4ED371F7.9000107@freebsd.org> <CAGsORuBzukGHHRKokkJgsvDSZjw5ef-EiTjsG7T=dAsAEJ-tGQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
maybe mark BROKEN, not IGNORE? can I include BROKEN in pam_fprint and fprint_demo if osversin < 800069? On 11/28/11 6:43 AM, Zhihao Yuan wrote: > > The problem has been discussed here > www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/161224 > <http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/161224> > > The thing is, we need libusb-1.0, what you referred in ports is 0.1x > I guess I am confused somewhat. its got me running in circles. libfprint only needs libusb on fbsd 7.x, right? .if ${OSVERSION} < 800069 IGNORE= libusb-1.0 is not avaible on FreeBSD < 8 .else CONFIGURE_ENV+= LIBUSB_CFLAGS=" " LIBUSB_LIBS="-lusb" .endif but in libusb, I see: .if ${OSVERSION} >= 800069 IGNORE= has been already included into base system .endif should not the logic be, osversion < 80069 to include as a dependency libusb? or do we mark libfprint, and the two fprint programs BROKEN if osversion < 800069? -- Michael Scheidell, CTO o: 561-999-5000 d: 561-948-2259 >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011 * Best Intrusion Prevention Product * Hot Company Finalist 2011 * Best Email Security Product * Certified SNORT Integrator
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4ED3782D.70408>