Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:59:48 +0000 From: "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@FreeBSD.org> To: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: sem@FreeBSD.org, mark@mivok.net, net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [CFT] multiple FIB support in route(8) Message-ID: <4F2DC674.4070401@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20120205.033532.381149506660559829.hrs@allbsd.org> References: <20120205.033532.381149506660559829.hrs@allbsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 04.02.2012 18:35, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Hello, > > Can anyone review/test the attached patch to add "-fib number" option > to route(8)? This should simplify static route configuration across > multiple FIBs in rc.conf. Just adding an -fib option like the > following will do the trick without changing rc.d/routing: > > static_routes="foo bar" > route_foo="10.1.1.1/24 192.168.2.1 -fib 2" > route_bar="10.1.1.1/24 192.168.2.1 -fib 3" > > The -fib option is supported in all subcommands but monitor. Why should we leave `monitor` as is? And, even if we really need to do so why "route monitor" silently accepts and ignores -fib X key? > > -- Hiroki
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F2DC674.4070401>