Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 08:41:32 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell <scheidell@FreeBSD.org> To: <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: PORTVERSION=1.0.0b Message-ID: <4FB8E67C.5030001@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I seem to remember some discussion on using numeric only, and not alpha in PORTVERSION string, and would like to address this with maintainer unless its just my faulty memory mixing up PORTVERSION/REVISION. only thing I found ~seems~ to indicate using alpha is ok: <http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/makefile-naming.html#AEN504>; portlint -abt doesn't complain, but it is a 'new port' and I don't want it to start out life with something that will garner larts,pavmail or other wise generate public flogging once I commit it. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FB8E67C.5030001>