Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 18:41:59 +0200 From: Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@gwdg.de> To: "coder.tuxfamily" <coder@tuxfamily.org> Cc: sunpoet@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gdal 1.9.1 (Was Re: graphics/gdal 1.9.0 does not build on CURRENT) Message-ID: <4FC107D7.5060905@gwdg.de> In-Reply-To: <4FC0FB76.2070702@tuxfamily.org> References: <4FBA9620.3020207@gwdg.de> <4FBA997C.6010000@tuxfamily.org> <4FBAA203.90201@gwdg.de> <4FBAA388.1070906@tuxfamily.org> <4FBB24D3.4010209@gwdg.de> <4FBBC3F2.4050104@tuxfamily.org> <4FBBC504.5010305@gwdg.de> <4FBBD7B4.5090505@tuxfamily.org> <4FBBFADA.6010700@gwdg.de> <4FBD0797.9040803@gwdg.de> <4FBD0EE2.9050703@tuxfamily.org> <4FBD122E.9030606@gwdg.de> <4FBF4303.8020501@gwdg.de> <4FBFE2B8.5000601@tuxfamily.org> <4FBFF060.9070706@gwdg.de> <4FC0FB76.2070702@tuxfamily.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 26.05.2012 17:49 (UTC+2), coder.tuxfamily wrote:
> Le 25.05.2012 22:49, Rainer Hurling a écrit :
>> On 25.05.2012 21:51 (UTC+1), coder.tuxfamily wrote:
>>> Can you try to build the "new" port of gdal ?
>>>
>>> I have the same problem with swig for php...
>>
>> Thanks for the update. It builds and installs fine here on two boxes
>> with 10.0-CURRENT (amd64).
>>
>> One issue which should be thought about before updating gdal in the
>> ports:
>>
>> Does gdal-1.9.1 really needs swig 2.0? It seems so for at least libkml?
>>
>> The problem is, that in your Makefile swig 2.0 conflicts with an
>> installed swig 1.3.40, which is needed for example by graphics/geos,
>> graphics/graphviz, math/saga, science/py-scipy and some others.
>>
>> Affected ports can be found for example with
>> find /usr/ports -name Makefile -depth 3 -exec grep -l -e "swig13" {} \;
>>
>> I personally would prefer the newer swig 2.0 version (even for most
>> other ports). Do you think it is necessary to forbid a parallel swig
>> 1.3.40 installation in your port? I read somewhere that both swig ports
>> can coexist in principle, only some docs share the same places (which
>> should be changed, of course).
>>
>
> Maybe you're right. I've see on trac.osgeo.org that it uses swig-1.3.40.
> I will try without specify version of swig.
I saw in the news on http://www.swig.org/, that swig 2.0.6 is out with
many bug fixes and enhancements for templates and target languages like
php and python. Perhaps swig 2.0.6 is ready now for gdal?
I just checked, that swig 1.3.40 and 2.0.4 should be able to coexist at
the same time. At least they do not share any filenames.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FC107D7.5060905>