Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 01 Jul 2016 16:32:14 -0700
From:      "Chris H" <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com>
To:        <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: what to do when base openssl isn't suitable
Message-ID:  <4c6170a82043b9d9b3064712ac66c411@ultimatedns.net>
In-Reply-To: <20160701231636.hflccfi7mwnmbpqo@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
References:  <201607012141.u61LfYBN093987@gw.catspoiler.org> <19b788f5df8b3bf6e698418823613d9a@ultimatedns.net>, <20160701231636.hflccfi7mwnmbpqo@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 2 Jul 2016 01:16:36 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> wrote

> On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 04:15:12PM -0700, Chris H wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 14:41:34 -0700 (PDT) Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org>
> > wrote 
> > > On  1 Jul, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> > > > Don Lewis wrote on 07/01/2016 20:59:
> > > >> I've got a port that does not work with base openssl because it looks
> > > >> for libssl.pc.  Other than that, I don't think it is picky about what
> > > >> flavor of ports ssl is installed.  Because the default version of ssl
> > > >> still defaults to base, I don't see a way to get this port to build on
> > > >> the cluster, so there is no way to provide binary packages.  That's a
> > > >> problem for end users because this port has bunch of huge build
> > > >> dependencies.  Thoughts?
> > > > 
> > > > There are already packages depending on ports OpenSSL because they need
> > > > /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/libssl.pc (installed by openssl-1.0.2_14) 
> > > > so I think you can make port depending on ports openssl.
> > > > See nginx for example.
> > > > 
> > > > .if defined(NGINX_OPENSSL)
> > > > USE_OPENSSL= yes
> > > 
> > > USE_OPENSSL is now deprecated and has been replaced by USES=ssl
> > > 
> > > > .if ${OSVERSION} < 1100000
> > > > WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes
> > > 
> > > WITH_OPENSSL_PORT is now deprecated.  Even before that I don't think it
> > > was intended to be used in the port Makefile, only in /etc/make.conf.
> > > The suggested replacement is to put DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=ssl=openssl in
> > > /etc/make.conf.
> > 
> > Wouldn't something along the lines of
> > 
> > SSL_LIB_DEPENDS=    libssl.pc:security/openssl
> > 
> libssl.pc? nothing will ever work with this line :)
Right, and I noticed what I had done the moment I hit
the send button. So was forced to send another reply
with the *intended* suggestion. :/

SSLLIB_DESC=	OpenSSL support

SSL_LIB_DEPENDS=	libssl.so:security/openssl
SSLLIB_CONFIGURE_WITH=	ssllib

or perhaps more simply

LIB_DEPENDS=	libssl.so:security/openssl

in an appropriate location for an SSL option,
assuming it's even optional.


> 
> Best regards,
> Bapt

--Chris

--





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4c6170a82043b9d9b3064712ac66c411>