Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:31:50 -0300 (BRT)
From:      "Nenhum_de_Nos" <matheus@eternamente.info>
To:        pyunyh@gmail.com
Cc:        freebsd-usb@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 10Mbps+ throughput usb based ethernet recommendation
Message-ID:  <4f4516c4a748aacfbd62cad9691afb90.squirrel@cygnus.homeunix.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100327021954.GY1278@michelle.cdnetworks.com>
References:  <20100324214230.GT1278@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <20100324215827.GU1278@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <20100324231833.GX1278@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <35a626b67a1556071f4c76498214581d.squirrel@cygnus.homeunix.com> <20100325173556.GA1278@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <b5b7224dd079150dcb9c932ef6603e08.squirrel@cygnus.homeunix.com> <20100326003150.GI1278@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <e15b32df866e9001a9f0971b2393bce2.squirrel@cygnus.homeunix.com> <20100326195012.GS1278@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <6672a5444e755931f93f58f7b2df28c4.squirrel@cygnus.homeunix.com> <20100327021954.GY1278@michelle.cdnetworks.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Fri, March 26, 2010 23:19, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:03:50PM -0300, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, March 26, 2010 16:50, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>> > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 09:57:22PM -0300, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
>> >
>> > [...]
>> >
>> >> >> miibus1: <MII bus> on axe0
>> >> >> ukphy0: <Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface> PHY 1 on miibus1
>> >> >> ukphy0: XXX ID1 = 0x7949, ID2 = 0x7949
>> >> >
>> >> > This value looks garbage.
>> >>
>> >> :(
>> >>
>> >> >> ukphy0:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX,
>> 1000baseSX,
>> >> >> 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto
>> >> >
>> >> > And this time, ukphy(4) also thinks your PHY supports 1000baseSX.
>> >> > Of course it's wrong because PHY is copper type.
>> >> > By chance, are you using Belkin F5D5055 USB controller? I remember
>> >> > another user also reported similar issue.
>> >>
>> >> yes. I have two of them.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Ok, would you try attached patch and check whether the patch prints
>> > some error messages on your console? I guess some commands are
>> > timed out here.
>>
>> ugen1.3: <vendor 0x050d> at usbus1
>> axe0: <vendor 0x050d product 0x5055, rev 2.00/0.01, addr 3> on usbus1
>> axe0: PHYADDR 0xe0:0x01
>> miibus1: <MII bus> on axe0
>> ukphy0: <Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface> PHY 1 on miibus1
>> ukphy0: XXX ID1 = 0x0282, ID2 = 0xf012
>> ukphy0:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT,
>> 1000baseT-FDX, auto
>> ue0: <USB Ethernet> on axe0
>> ue0: Ethernet address: xx.xx.xx.xx.xx.xx
>> ue0: link state changed to DOWN
>> ue0: link state changed to UP
>> ue0: link state changed to DOWN
>> ue0: link state changed to UP
>> ue0: link state changed to DOWN
>> ue0: link state changed to UP
>> wlan0: link state changed to UP
>> ue0: link state changed to DOWN
>> ue0: link state changed to UP
>> vboxnet0: Ethernet address: 0a:00:27:00:00:00
>> nfe0: promiscuous mode enabled
>> wlan0: link state changed to DOWN
>> wlan0: link state changed to UP
>> ue0: link state changed to DOWN
>> ue0: link state changed to UP
>> wlan0: link state changed to DOWN
>> wlan0: link state changed to UP
>> ue0: link state changed to DOWN
>> ue0: link state changed to UP
>> wlan0: link state changed to DOWN
>> wlan0: link state changed to UP
>> ue0: link state changed to DOWN
>> ue0: link state changed to UP
>> wlan0: link state changed to DOWN
>> wlan0: link state changed to UP
>> nfe0: link state changed to UP
>> wlan0: link state changed to DOWN
>> wlan0: link state changed to UP
>> wlan0: link state changed to DOWN
>> wlan0: link state changed to UP
>> wlan0: link state changed to DOWN
>> wlan0: link state changed to UP
>> nfe0: link state changed to DOWN
>> ue0: link state changed to DOWN
>> nfe0: link state changed to UP
>> ue0: link state changed to UP
>> wlan0: link state changed to DOWN
>> wlan0: link state changed to UP
>> nfe0: tx v2 error 0x6100
>   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> It seems you have nfe(4) Tx issues here. You may want to check
> negotiated speed/duplex is correct against switch. If you have
> manual media configuration instead of auto, nuke that
> configuration. nfe(4) has a long standing issue when manual media
> configuration is used.

I'm linking my nfe0 from notebook, bridged in a vbox freebsd machine, and
the usb nic. the media is auto (not manually changed since boot) on both
ue0 (native freebsd), nfe0 native and em0 (guest freebsd).

>> arp: xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx is using my IP address 10.1.1.1 on ue0!
>> wlan0: link state changed to DOWN
>> wlan0: link state changed to UP
>> wlan0: link state changed to DOWN
>> wlan0: link state changed to UP
>> wlan0: link state changed to DOWN
>> wlan0: link state changed to UP
>> wlan0: link state changed to DOWN
>> wlan0: link state changed to UP
>>
>> so far, just this after plugging the usb nic. tested iperf and the
>> behavior was the same, but nothing in logs.
>>
>> just noticed this:
>>
>> ukphy0: XXX ID1 = 0x0282, ID2 = 0xf012
>>
>> this is not the same as the other mail. I think is the same adapter (as
>> I
>> have two), but this should change with the nic change ?
>>
>> I changed and got this:
>>
>> miibus1: <MII bus> on axe0
>> ukphy0: <Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface> PHY 1 on miibus1
>> ukphy0: XXX ID1 = 0x0282, ID2 = 0xf012
>   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> This is *NOT* bogus value. It's Agere Systems' ET1011 gigabit PHY.
> FreeBSD has truephy(4) for Agere Systems' PHY but it does not have
> support code for the model yet.

so I can think that's the issue, right ?

>> ukphy0:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT,
>> 1000baseT-FDX, auto
>> ue0: <USB Ethernet> on axe0
>> ue0: Ethernet address: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> ue0: link state changed to DOWN
>>
>> so it didn't now. other thing is that not every time it works:
>>
>
> Yeah, that is real issue here. I guess there should be some magic
> to wakeup the PHY from deep sleep state. I'll see what can be done.

ok, great it was found :)

let me know if I can help in anything :)

matheus

-- 
We will call you cygnus,
The God of balance you shall be

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4f4516c4a748aacfbd62cad9691afb90.squirrel>