Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 08:05:38 -0800 From: William Sommers <sommers@sfo.com> To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Danger Ports Message-ID: <5.0.0.25.2.20001201075130.085f1460@pop.sfo.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0012010027360.34557-100000@systemadmin.shelt onbbs.com> References: <20001130221631.E99903@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 12:28 AM 12/1/00 -0600, Butch Evans wrote: >> > > access-list 110 deny ip 172.16.0.0 0.15.255.255 any log >> > > access-list 110 deny ip 172.31.0.0 0.0.255.255 any log >> >> > access-list 110 deny ip any 172.16.0.0 0.15.255.255 log >> > access-list 110 deny ip any 172.31.0.0 0.0.255.255 log >> >> Is it me? Isn't the second network in each a subset of the first? >> > Now that I re-read your question, I see what you are saying...You are > correct. Um, unless I'm not yet fully caffeinated: 172.16.0.0 0.15.255.255 matches 176.16.0.0 - 176.30.255.255 172.31.0.0 0.0.255.255 matches 176.31.0.0 - 176.31.255.255 No overlap at all. -wfs To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.0.0.25.2.20001201075130.085f1460>