Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 19:01:10 -0600 From: Sean O'Neill <sean@seanoneill.info> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: curious if anyone noticed the perl-5.8.0_04 seems a bit whacky ? Message-ID: <5.2.0.9.0.20030205185408.00ae0658@pop.swbell.yahoo.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I just portupgraded from perl-5.8.0_01 to perl-5.8.0_04 - or more appropriately I tried. Anyone noticed that the perl-5.8.0_04 port installs stuff in /usr/local/scripts, e.g. h2ph and others, but a pkginfo -L shows these same files are being installed in /usr/local/bin. A problem with this is during the installation process it fails right towards the end because h2ph ends up in /usr/local/scripts/h2ph but the installation process is hard coded expecting it in /usr/local/bin/h2ph. I manually copied h2ph to /usr/local/bin and redid a "make install" and the port installed. But now the pkgdb is basically wrong for lots of the files. Anyone else seen this ? -- ........................................................ ......... ..- -. .. -..- .-. ..- .-.. . ... ............ .-- .. -. -... .-.. --- .-- ... -.. .-. --- --- .-.. ... Sean O'Neill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.2.0.9.0.20030205185408.00ae0658>