Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:23:59 -0500 From: Marco Muskus <marcomuskus@une.net.co> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Anonymous Remailer \(austria\)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> Subject: Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o Message-ID: <5021DBCF.4050302@une.net.co> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208072309370.1652@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <793d6519ca3648de7634faff1829b9f7@remailer.privacy.at> <5021641E.4030206@une.net.co> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208072309370.1652@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
El 07/08/12 16:09, Wojciech Puchar escribió: >> >> English is not my native language, so i can make mistakes. ZFS is the >> way to go if you need consistency + speed on a NFS server/service. > > Of course "ZFS doesn't need fsck". Until it fails. > Did you personally try ZFS ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5021DBCF.4050302>