Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 11 Sep 2012 21:42:31 -1000
From:      Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "Pedro F. Giffuni" <giffunip@tutopia.com>
Cc:        Olivier Smedts <olivier@gid0.org>, "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: x11-toolkits/swt
Message-ID:  <50503CE7.7040005@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <1347379093.33512.YahooMailNeo@web113508.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
References:  <504ED5EC.6040804@FreeBSD.org> <CABzXLYPHQvGX05037aHDBjZcD2MK82fNh1=e03CORpmv-xKGNQ@mail.gmail.com> <1347379093.33512.YahooMailNeo@web113508.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/11/2012 05:58 AM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> Hello guys;
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>  ...
>>
>> 2012/9/11 Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>:
>>>  Now that we have a new version of libxul in the ports tree, any plans of
>>>  upgrading swt to take advantage of it? I'd love to get the
>>>  vulnerabilities in the old version off of my daily periodic.
>>
>> Meanwhile, I've had success with x11-toolkits/swt-devel for
>> mail/davmail and java/eclipse (btw, for me eclipse compiles only if
>> swt-devel is installed, not swt).
>>
> 
> I think we can safely replace x11-toolkits/swt with x11-toolkits/swt-devel.

As long as davmail continues to work, I'm happy. :)

Does anyone have patches? I'm happy to test it this weekend.

Doug




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50503CE7.7040005>