Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 18:52:19 -0500 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu> To: "Klaus T. Aehlig" <aehlig@linta.de> Cc: "ctm-users@freebsd.org" <ctm-users@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn-cur Message-ID: <505E4F33.9060006@missouri.edu> In-Reply-To: <20120922094319.GA55036@curry.linta.de> References: <4EF55B2B.9010700@missouri.edu> <20120921044729.GA47944@curry.linta.de> <505C6570.8060801@missouri.edu> <20120922094319.GA55036@curry.linta.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/22/2012 04:43 AM, Klaus T. Aehlig wrote: > > Dear Stephen, > >> Can you think of a way that ctm_rmail would work in both instances >> (check both for 4 and 5 digit numbers, and check gz and xz)? I think >> that is what is needed if the tool is to be universal. > > yes, you're right. One should take care of all cases. See a new version of > the patch attached. > > Best, > Klaus > Do you mind if I put your patch on the CTM ftp sites? I'll attribute it to you. I should add, I haven't tested them myself, but I trust that you did a good job. I don't use ctm_ramil myself. The only change I will make is to the path names in the first two lines patch, so that it can be applied the same way as my patches.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?505E4F33.9060006>