Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 07 Mar 2002 06:59:08 +0100
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
To:        obrien@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc:        Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>, Mike Meyer <mwm-dated-1015843484.1eabc5@mired.org>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. 
Message-ID:  <52204.1015480748@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 06 Mar 2002 19:22:34 PST." <20020306192234.B55297@dragon.nuxi.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20020306192234.B55297@dragon.nuxi.com>, "David O'Brien" writes:

>Implies???  I thought I was quite explicit:
>
>    to prevent is "if (!strcmp(a,b))" which when read is extremely wrong of
>    that is actually happening.
>
>! is pronounced "NOT".  When read "if not string compare a with b then do X",
>is the opposite of the the logic of the expression does.  Which is
>"if string compare a with b is equal then do X".  ["if (strcmp(a,b) == 0)"]

Well, we're clearly into "IMO" land here, so lets ignore that :-)

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52204.1015480748>