Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:40:28 +0300
From:      Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, Jimmy Olgeni <olgeni@olgeni.com>
Subject:   Re: Possible kqueue related issue on STABLE/RC.
Message-ID:  <523234CC.7030004@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130912184900.GD41229@kib.kiev.ua>
References:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1309111705460.89324@olgeni.olgeni> <20130911171913.GG41229@kib.kiev.ua> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1309112316160.2547@olgeni.olgeni> <20130912073643.GM41229@kib.kiev.ua> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1309122024370.38459@olgeni.olgeni> <20130912184900.GD41229@kib.kiev.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 12/09/2013 21:49 Konstantin Belousov said the following:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:28:48PM +0200, Jimmy Olgeni wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>>
>>> Might be, your issue is that some filesystems do not care about proper
>>> locking mode for the fifos.  UFS carefully disables shared locking for
>>> VFIFO, but it seems ZFS is not.  I can propose the following band-aid,
>>> which could help you.
>>
>> This certainly seems to improve things. I have been running builds
>> for the past couple of hours without any critical problem.
> Ok, so it is ZFS indeed.  I think I will commit the band-aid to head
> shortly.

I am not sure if my message <5231A016.7060906@FreeBSD.org> was intercepted by
NSA and didn't reach you...  At least I haven't seen any reaction to it.
So, ZFS does not need this band-aid.  If you think that it may be needed for
other filesystems or is useful in general, then okay.

Just in case, r254694 is not in releng/9.2 and I haven't seen any evidence that
Jimmy has tested a tree that included that commit.

>> I spotted a few LORs but nothing bad happened so far:
>>
>>      http://olgeni.olgeni.com/~olgeni/dmesg-2013-09-12
> Out of curiousity, please look up the line for vm_object_terminate+0x1d8.
> 
>>
>> If it keeps working this way I hope there's still some time to fit it 
>> into an -RC.
> 
> For 10.0 yes, 9.2 is sealed (hopefully).
> 


-- 
Andriy Gapon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?523234CC.7030004>