Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 23:23:00 +0800 (SGT) From: "Jett Tayer" <jett@angdatingdaan.org> To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rndc reload and BIND9 Message-ID: <52676.202.175.229.210.1120663380.squirrel@mail.angdatingdaan.org> In-Reply-To: <20050706105612.W22721@beck.quonix.net> References: <3b88b80a0507051933f4750f3@mail.gmail.com><06ef01c581f6$c54fb3c0$de0a0a0a@visionsix.com> <20050706105612.W22721@beck.quonix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
a master/slave relationship is better. and will only "zone transfer" what has changed :) > > Following a post I had about BIND9, I need to verify a certain behavior > with BIND9 and issuing a rndc reload. > > Instead, of having a master and slave, I am going to have two masters. One > master is the real master, the other gets replicated via rsync. The main > reason for this approach is to cut down on all the zone transfers (we > have 12,000 domains). >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52676.202.175.229.210.1120663380.squirrel>