Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 17:23:11 +0200 From: Stefan Lambrev <stefan.lambrev@moneybookers.com> To: Paul Pathiakis <pathiaki2@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Subject: Re: Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs Message-ID: <52B3EE9B-9B4A-4F96-ADE3-83F56135183D@moneybookers.com> In-Reply-To: <448737.83863.qm@web110508.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <4D26FBD3.20307@quip.cz> <448737.83863.qm@web110508.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Having in mind that a SAS enterprise disk normally can handle = 150-180IOPS, this benchmark is testing something else ;) Well there is a one thing which is clear from almost every Phoronix = benchmark - Linux is heavily optimized ... for unpacking the linux = kernel :) On Jan 7, 2011, at 4:12 PM, Paul Pathiakis wrote: > The results came out like this: >=20 > EXT3 - ~3000 tps > EXT4 - ~3800 tps > XFS - ~ 1800 tps > ZFS - 75000 tps -- Best Wishes, Stefan Lambrev ICQ# 24134177
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52B3EE9B-9B4A-4F96-ADE3-83F56135183D>