Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 23:14:05 +0100 From: Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: graphics/rawtherapee: r342622 crashes on HEAD Message-ID: <52FAA0AD.1070703@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <52FA91B3.2080201@gwdg.de> References: <20140209223228.GR80056@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <bfdcc4891e05f898e12591cb17be5527.squirrel@mx.waitman.net> <20140209223830.GS80056@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <53abb5a25f86f9c10fabcabb83e4157d.squirrel@mx.waitman.net> <20140210104037.7dcaf6b0@X220.alogt.com> <52F895F3.6070606@FreeBSD.org> <20140211010834.384f8a34@X220.alogt.com> <52F95186.9010503@FreeBSD.org> <20140211192707.GB1943@elch.exwg.net> <52FA8A6B.7020504@gwdg.de> <20140211205507.GC1943@elch.exwg.net> <52FA91B3.2080201@gwdg.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 11.02.2014 22:10, schrieb Rainer Hurling: > Am 11.02.2014 21:55, schrieb Christoph Moench-Tegeder: >> My base is 10.0-RELEASE, and the port is "totally recent" >> (rawtherapee-4.0.12_1, Makefile r343191). converters/libiconv >> hadn't been installed until "right now". >> OTOH I'm very careful with using umlauts in file names etc. (been bitten >> once too often), even as my environment is UTF-8, so I might >> have missed that issue when testing. > > Thanks for this info. So perhaps your situation is like the one, > mandree@ observed on his 10.0 box: no crashes without the patch? I am also using 10.0-RELEASE. So the question is if someone has (had) problems with rawtherapee on 10-*STABLE* (OSVERSION >= 1000500) while glib20 is still at glib-2.36.3_1? Please speak up if you are one of them! Because if so that might suggest we are facing regressions from 10-RELEASE to 10-STABLE and from 10-RELEASE to 11-STABLE. That might warrant investigation.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52FAA0AD.1070703>