Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:27:29 -0600 From: Eric van Gyzen <eric@vangyzen.net> To: Sami Halabi <sodynet1@gmail.com>, <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: TSO Message-ID: <530E3211.6020805@vangyzen.net> In-Reply-To: <CAEW%2BogYVto3rr6LHVsG4rOuyhXt3ZWbH2kWNk-1kAmwDKROEqg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAEW%2BogYVto3rr6LHVsG4rOuyhXt3ZWbH2kWNk-1kAmwDKROEqg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 02/26/2014 11:37, Sami Halabi wrote: > Hi, > I'm reading (almost) all mailing emails in mailig list... > > Almost every / many problem in network performancr / packets loss ended up > suggesting disabling TSO. > > I wonder why.. Is it a bug in the implementation? Or bybdesign? > What are the usecases that TSO is needed? Myabe it should be disabled bt > default? In some cases, I have disabled TSO to [successfully] work around a bug in a particular NIC's firmware or hardware, usually a low-end "desktop" gigabit NIC. Eric
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?530E3211.6020805>