Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:47:42 +0100 From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Philippe_Aud=E9oud?= <jadawin@FreeBSD.org>, marino@freebsd.org Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date Message-ID: <5322DE4E.7090200@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <20140314093036.GB17905@tuxaco.net> References: <201403140915.s2E9Fa8I009565@portscout.freebsd.org> <5322CB0E.7000908@marino.st> <20140314093036.GB17905@tuxaco.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/14/2014 10:30, Philippe Audéoud wrote: > On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, John Marino wrote: > >> On 3/14/2014 10:15, portscout@FreeBSD.org wrote: >>> Port | Current version | New version >>> ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ >>> games/doomsday | 1.12.2 | 1.14.0-build1168 >>> ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ >> >> This port squawks constantly. >> Can we either get the last submitter to take it over or put it on the >> to-be-killed list? Or tell portscout to ignore it? Too much noise on >> already high volume channel. >> >> John > > Hello John, > > games/doomsday is maintained by ports@. Right -- that's why portscout is bombarding the ports@ mail list. If it were maintained we wouldn't see it. > games/doomsday is maintained by ports@. Feel free to make it as ignored > for portscout. Is this the general understanding? Anytime any committer gets annoyed with high-frequency portscout squawks on ports@ we just disable it without asking? John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5322DE4E.7090200>