Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:47:14 -0700 From: Steve Franks <bahamasfranks@gmail.com> To: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: devd or devfs for ucom? Message-ID: <539c60b90906101147r222a3faeg9ccf3195dc6c3d4b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <539c60b90906101137v542a6185s5ffe06407759da1f@mail.gmail.com> References: <539c60b90906101137v542a6185s5ffe06407759da1f@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Steve Franks<bahamasfranks@gmail.com> wro= te: > I'm having trouble making my ucom devices public, following the > handbook (had it working on 7.0, but had a disk crash). > > So, should I be using devd.conf or devfs.rules? =A0They sure seem built > to do the same thing to me... > > Thanks, > Steve > While I wouldn't mind an answer to that question, it's actually working; however, my program that uses libftdi & libusb to talk to my ugen still needs to run as sudo to see the device - but if I run chmod 666 /dev/* (which I'm sure is a bad idea), I don't need sudo; what device is required for libusb besides ugen? The hub? Best, Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?539c60b90906101147r222a3faeg9ccf3195dc6c3d4b>