Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 20:32:22 +0200 From: olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de> To: perl <perl@freebsd.org> Cc: Olli Hauer <ohauer@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Mk/Uses/perl.mk possible regression Message-ID: <53F0F536.9000708@gmx.de>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
what is wrong with the following USE(ES)_PERL5 statements?
I have a port installing a packlist and the qa-script complains about the path in the .packlist file.
So I add 'USE_PERL5+=fixpacklist' to the Makefile and lost all perl dependences.
Using only
test 1)
USES= perl5
$ make -V BUILD_DEPENDS
gmake:/usr/ports/devel/gmake /usr/local/bin/perl5.16.3:/usr/ports/lang/perl5.16
$ make -V RUN_DEPENDS
/usr/local/bin/perl5.16.3:/usr/ports/lang/perl5.16
=> OK
test 2)
USES= perl5
USE_PERL5+= fixpacklist
$ make -V BUILD_DEPENDS
gmake:/usr/ports/devel/gmake
$ make -V RUN_DEPENDS
-- nothing
perl dependency is completely gone.
Looking into Mk/Uses/perl5.mk the explanations is
# USE_PERL5 - If set, this port uses perl5 in one or more of the extract,
# patch, build, install or run phases. The fixpacklist is
# needed in some cases, when a .packlist is created, it may
# reference ${STAGEDIR}
...
Any hints what's going wrong?
--
olli
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53F0F536.9000708>