Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 13:13:51 -0600 From: "Jay Austad" <austad@marketwatch.com> To: <net@freebsd.org> Subject: gif0 tunnel and rip (using zebra) Message-ID: <54180709DD3FE145917BB165AFE7EFA002E0D4A3@mspexch2.office.mktw.net> In-Reply-To: <F158Ir6dZqN3SsxoqwN00003fcf@hotmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'm trying to propagate rip routes using zebra (ripd) across a gif0 tunnel interface to another freebsd box running zebra. I have zebra and ripd running, but they only seem to broadcast routes out the fxp0 interface, and not across the gif0 tunnel. It's quite annoying. A "show ip protocols" in the ripd vty shows that both fxp0 and gif0 are sending and receiving RIP updates. However tcpdump shows otherwise. I really don't need to use zebra, but I'd like to. Otherwise, if someone can help me with a gated config which completely excludes fxp1, does not broadcast a default route, and only broadcasts and accepts routes on the fxp0 and gif0 interfaces, I would gladly use that. The endpoints on the gif0 tunnel are tied down to addresses assigned to the lo1 interface on each side. Should I tie these down to the addresses assigned to fxp0 instead? When I did it this way, traceroute would not work across the tunnel. Also, does FreeBSD 4.5 support GRE tunnels? Thanks. Jay To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54180709DD3FE145917BB165AFE7EFA002E0D4A3>