Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:46:23 +0000 From: Joe Holden <lists@rewt.org.uk> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-15:02.kmem Message-ID: <54C966BF.9000803@rewt.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20150128211910.80082283DA18@rock.dv.isc.org> References: <mailman.92.1422446402.71362.freebsd-security@freebsd.org> <20150128194011.2175B19F@hub.freebsd.org> <20150128211910.80082283DA18@rock.dv.isc.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Really, how many SCTP users are there om the wild... maybe one? It shouldn't be in GENERIC at the very least! On 28/01/2015 21:19, Mark Andrews wrote: > > In message <20150128194011.2175B19F@hub.freebsd.org>, "Roger Marquis" writes: >>>> If SCTP is NOT compiled in the kernel, are you still vulnerable ? >>> >>> No -- we should have mentioned that too. For GENERIC kernel however >>> SCTP is compiled in. >> >> Should probably fix that too, in GENERIC, considering how little used this >> protocol is. > > It is not used much because there is not critical mass and you want > to reduce what little there is out there? It is a good thing that > it is in GENERIC. > > Mark > >> Roger Marquis >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54C966BF.9000803>