Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 07:18:12 -0700 From: Patrick Powell <papowell@astart.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Apache 2.4 must become default NOW Message-ID: <5565D224.9060203@astart.com> In-Reply-To: <53C32862.601@sorbs.net> References: <0E822D68-96E1-4328-9D00-1ADBF5671699@lists.zabbadoz.net> <53B9CD64.3010707@gmx.de> <20140706231559.GB8523@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <53C32862.601@sorbs.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 07/13/14 17:46, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
> Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 12:27:48AM +0200, olli hauer wrote:
>>
>>> On 2014-07-05 19:09, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> given ports@ ist listed as maintainer, you get the email. The Subject says it. The world has moved on; in March I had a hard time arguing, in July I just cannot anymore. We must switch to 2.4; whatever breaks needs fixing, but somehow other distributions have managed and we did not and keep screwing our users missing a lot of security features.
>>>>
>>>> Please fix!
>>>>
>>>> —
>>>> Bjoern A. Zeeb "Come on. Learn, goddamn it.", WarGames, 1983
>>>>
>>> Hi Bjoern,
>>>
>>> nothing against this change, except your complain comes a little bit late.
>>>
>>> The portstree was already tagged for 9.3 some days ago so this change would be a possible issue for all users using the 9.3 packages.
>>>
>>> Before the default version can be changed a full expr. run by portmgr@ is required and all possible issues should be fixed.
>>>
>>> Unluckily we have a rolling ports tree (not like RHEL and others where such a change happens during new major releases) so there should be also a time frame to warn users about such a change.
>>>
>>> I remember endless discussions about the removal of apache13 after it was already deprecated nearly one year after upstream deprecation ...
>>>
>> Just provide the patch for the change and warn the user about the change, now,
>> just do not MFH it to the quarterly branch, so the user willing to keep apache22
>> for a while can live on the quarterly branch for the next 3 months :)
>>
>> I don't see the problem for the people using 9.3 packages, if they want
>> stability they will stay on quarterly branch which still provides by default
>> apache22 for 3 month.
>>
>> Hopefully when pkg 1.3 will land we will be able to add new feature to the ports
>> tree aka build the apache module for all supported apache version leading to
>> anyone using package being able to chose the apache version they what whatever
>> the default is (but we are not there yet :))
>>
> One would have hoped that mod_perl2 would have had this removed first:
>
> .if ${APACHE_VERSION} > 22
> BROKEN= Does not build with apache24
> .endif
>
> Just my small (557 packages) build set:
>
> ====>> Skipped ports: devel/bugzilla44 devel/p5-Log-Dispatch
> www/p5-Apache-DBI www/p5-HTML-Mason www/p5-HTML-Mason-PSGIHandler
> www/p5-MasonX-Profiler www/p5-RT-Authen-ExternalAuth www/p5-libapreq2
> www/rt40
>
>
> Michelle
>
I believe that this has been fixed for at least since Sept 2014. There
is a 'test and debugging' version of mod_perl2 that appears to have the
required mods/changes, but they have not been rolled into the upstream
distribution.
I wonder what happened to the mod_perl updating process...
--
Patrick Powell Astart Technologies
papowell@astart.com 1530 Jamacha Rd, Suite X
Network and System San Diego, CA 92019
Consulting 858-874-6543 FAX 858-751-2435
Web: www.astart.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5565D224.9060203>