Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:09:52 -0500 From: "Bill Marquette" <bill.marquette@gmail.com> To: "Eduardo Meyer" <dudu.meyer@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to balance my own outgoing traffic? Message-ID: <55e8a96c0703271009o19bcb3dfp29929357516292f9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <d3ea75b30703270638n23e79976h383d138bf29e9bc5@mail.gmail.com> References: <d3ea75b30703270620v3654c638w9a4a7d2a61dc2c39@mail.gmail.com> <46091B41.4020307@joeholden.co.uk> <d3ea75b30703270638n23e79976h383d138bf29e9bc5@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/27/07, Eduardo Meyer <dudu.meyer@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, round-robin will do. My problem is how to do this, I have tried
> the following kiind of approach:
>
> pass out on $ext_if route-to { ($ext_if1 $ext_gw1), ($ext_if2
> $ext_gw2) } round-robin proto tcp from $myown to any flags S/SA
> modulate state
route-to tends to work better inbound on your internal interfaces.
pass in on $int_if route-to { ($ext_if1 $ext_gw1), ($ext_if2
$ext_gw2) } round-robin proto tcp from $myown to any flags S/SA
modulate state
>
> However I can not, say, route-to $ext_gw2 traffic from $ext_ifi1's IP
> address. I need to combine it with NAT, right?
>
> How to do this is what I am confused.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55e8a96c0703271009o19bcb3dfp29929357516292f9>