Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 06:46:15 +0000 From: Graham Perrin <grahamperrin@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports: looking ahead: Portsnap, after Git becomes primary Message-ID: <5777f16a-60e1-0982-4d4c-58e2bc2db1fa@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5ffbafbc.1c69fb81.34c15.3b26SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> References: <20210110133605.6538dfd5@dismail.de> <5ffbafbc.1c69fb81.34c15.3b26SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/01/2021 01:53, Thomas Mueller wrote: > … I expect to switch to git with ports tree as well around the end of March when the ports tree is expected to switch from svn to git. > > I suspect portsnap will no longer be workable. … I imagine that after Git becomes primary, Portsnap will remain usable for a respectable period. (Compare with <https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2020-December/077913.html>, which discusses continuing use of Subversion for src.) Expect a 'ports Specific' section at <https://github.com/bsdimp/freebsd-git-docs/blob/main/SUMMARY.md>; in due course :-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5777f16a-60e1-0982-4d4c-58e2bc2db1fa>