Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 28 Oct 2016 08:44:13 -0600
From:      Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org>
To:        freebsd-mips@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: MFC test request
Message-ID:  <57c4bb4f-1bba-5620-9a88-46364830c0d0@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <5813143B.3080308@grosbein.net>
References:  <20161027172820.GA44678@bluezbox.com> <5813143B.3080308@grosbein.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On 10/28/16 03:02, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> On 28.10.2016 00:28, Oleksandr Tymoshenko wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'd like to MFC r304459 to STABLE-11 but it has broken
>> MIPS interrupt handlers and there was follow up fix in
>> r305527. Discussion and review here:
>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D7692
>>
>> Can someone with MIPS hardware try to apply this patch
>> to STABLE-11 and boot patched kernel on Broadcom 4716
>> or MT7621? Or any other simmilar hardware. 
>>
>> https://people.freebsd.org/~gonzo/patches/stable-11-intrng.diff
> 
> I'd like to test it with my TP-Link WDR-3600 but 11-STABLE got really huge
> last months and my build stoppped to fit within 8M flash :-(
> 
> It seems, noone (or so) cares of FreeBSD kernel and userland size anymore.
> For example, it is not possible to build kernel without JAIL overhead etc.
> 
> _______________________________________________


I tend to care, but I haven't paid attention lately.  What kernel config
do you use?

sean



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?57c4bb4f-1bba-5620-9a88-46364830c0d0>