Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 08:44:13 -0600 From: Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-mips@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MFC test request Message-ID: <57c4bb4f-1bba-5620-9a88-46364830c0d0@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <5813143B.3080308@grosbein.net> References: <20161027172820.GA44678@bluezbox.com> <5813143B.3080308@grosbein.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/28/16 03:02, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > On 28.10.2016 00:28, Oleksandr Tymoshenko wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'd like to MFC r304459 to STABLE-11 but it has broken >> MIPS interrupt handlers and there was follow up fix in >> r305527. Discussion and review here: >> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D7692 >> >> Can someone with MIPS hardware try to apply this patch >> to STABLE-11 and boot patched kernel on Broadcom 4716 >> or MT7621? Or any other simmilar hardware. >> >> https://people.freebsd.org/~gonzo/patches/stable-11-intrng.diff > > I'd like to test it with my TP-Link WDR-3600 but 11-STABLE got really huge > last months and my build stoppped to fit within 8M flash :-( > > It seems, noone (or so) cares of FreeBSD kernel and userland size anymore. > For example, it is not possible to build kernel without JAIL overhead etc. > > _______________________________________________ I tend to care, but I haven't paid attention lately. What kernel config do you use? sean
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?57c4bb4f-1bba-5620-9a88-46364830c0d0>