Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 15:51:00 +0100 From: "Koster, K.J." <K.J.Koster@kpn.com> To: 'Jason Brazile' <jason@netcetera.ch> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: make bug? (dependency names with '$') Message-ID: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522026D7C43@l04.research.kpn.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dear Jason, > > I want to construct a portable Makefile to build a java application. > I've played with Java and Make in the past, but I found that spawning a new instance of the Java compiler is more expensive than compiling a pretty big bunch of files. gcc starts up a lot quicker than a JVM. My solution (ahem) is to compile per (sub)package of my application and simply let the JAR file depend on all of the source files. Compiling this way is quicker in the majority of cases that I have. Have you looked at Apache's Ant project? I don't like it myself, but if you want a portable make, you might as well use a Java one. :) Kees Jan ================================================ You are only young once, but you can stay immature all your life. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522026D7C43>