Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 22:18:50 -0700 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> To: Walter Schwarzenfeld <w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "Confused" PORTREVISION Message-ID: <59143D35-B810-4670-8F78-C8D7F0CF91B6@adamw.org> In-Reply-To: <2abbc227-f2da-69e0-1d0d-1b872bbc475f@utanet.at> References: <42ac3597-f82a-ef8d-0d8d-f6a7c5a84d46@utanet.at> <2abbc227-f2da-69e0-1d0d-1b872bbc475f@utanet.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 24 Dec, 2017, at 20:03, Walter Schwarzenfeld > <w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at> wrote: > > But > > RUBY_RELVERSION= 2.3.6 > RUBY_PORTREVISION= 0 <= > RUBY_PORTEPOCH= 1 > RUBY_PATCHLEVEL= 0 > RUBY23= "" # PLIST_SUB helpers > > PORTREVISION=0 confuses pkg version > > pkg version |grep ruby23 > ruby23-2.3.6,1 < > > this is the version which is installed. PORTREVISION=0 is treated as if it were unset. Some people prefer using that construct because it keeps line numbers consistent in the SVN history. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org http://www.adamw.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?59143D35-B810-4670-8F78-C8D7F0CF91B6>