Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 11:01:57 +0200 From: Harry Schmalzbauer <freebsd@omnilan.de> To: Vincenzo Maffione <v.maffione@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [panic] netmap(4) and if_lagg(4) Message-ID: <5927EF05.9040208@omnilan.de> In-Reply-To: <CA%2B_eA9gpKd1k2VJnzi=bE2Oy7LLUD=pxRCt9yS0nACB3YAX2Sw@mail.gmail.com> References: <58CBCD7A.8060301@omnilan.de> <CA%2B_eA9iCT7evWUcZMA_ViKfrZnSHp3OpBTS5c4iJ9=ZjO-Pfgw@mail.gmail.com> <58CC23F5.7060507@omnilan.de> <CA%2B_eA9iajZOUFsnWKdodN7zMvst8wn0xViM4xxEx%2B41jw_0B3g@mail.gmail.com> <58CFA394.8070901@omnilan.de> <CA%2B_eA9jf_VjcYUZynu5CXx-ps5z7PSxOky=QLpR-miqtxmMU5w@mail.gmail.com> <5926EE96.1010000@omnilan.de> <CA%2B_eA9gcMD1QyG35p5UY8kz6n1kF%2B56Arz3q1T8HVBfMv3XN0w@mail.gmail.com> <5926F9F9.4040706@omnilan.de> <CA%2B_eA9hripEStmfJhj_Q93OF5jFf2nfQXeuA2DnuSjBmJi6j4g@mail.gmail.com> <592701D6.7030301@omnilan.de> <592742A8.4010207@omnilan.de> <CA%2B_eA9jg-xXJpeyQkcFzA%2B-y=qbwROww2FRWzCN=dkmfkaQivQ@mail.gmail.com> <5927D560.10003@omnilan.de> <CA%2B_eA9jhDZ-Cnj8zyAcp=1dw=Q%2BZm2m%2BBkxK11x6Y%2BHLhX%2BrUg@mail.gmail.com> <5927D77A.60502@omnilan.de> <CA%2B_eA9j%2BN5-2om2DETe0K1sAUPqDgwuNuNbF2F9St6C-YCKWQg@mail.gmail.com> <5927E974.6060706@omnilan.de> <CA%2B_eA9gpKd1k2VJnzi=bE2Oy7LLUD=pxRCt9yS0nACB3YAX2Sw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bezüglich Vincenzo Maffione's Nachricht vom 26.05.2017 10:41 (localtime): > Ok, so you should try to completely replace the code in your > /usr/src/sys with the code in the upstream netmap > repository https://github.com/luigirizzo/netmap (sys directory). Sorry beeing so complicated; But is there a real chance this integrates and compiles well out of the box? My build machine (which is not the test machine) doesn't have internet access and additionally I'm not faimilar with git, so I'd have to find a solution getting the source first. And if I need to adapt/port anything to match stable/11, I won't be abel to do so (much too less knwoledge about all that code). I guess HEAD has already updated codebase. Maybe it's better to start with HEAD? But on the other hand, my test equipment is semi-productive with a quiet special setup (memory-rootfs with additional ZFS boot and sys-pool)... Very complicated I am... worth the stable/11 attempt? thanks, -harry
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5927EF05.9040208>