Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 24 Apr 2018 09:56:08 -0400
From:      Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
To:        Pete French <petefrench@ingresso.co.uk>, nimrodl@gmail.com
Cc:        truckman@freebsd.org, eric@vangyzen.net, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd@hda3.com, avg@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Ryzen issues on FreeBSD ? (with sort of workaround)
Message-ID:  <59b435cf-f4fb-0cc8-3bd0-0765ac0592da@sentex.net>
In-Reply-To: <E1fAaRY-0000nB-Ut@dilbert.ingresso.co.uk>
References:  <E1fAaRY-0000nB-Ut@dilbert.ingresso.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4/23/2018 8:19 AM, Pete French wrote:
> 
> All worked fine until just no,w when it did lockup. But the lockup
> happened when I fired up VirtualBox as well on the Ryzen machine, had that
> doing a lot of disc activity and also did a lot of ZFS activity on the box
> itself. Which I find interesting, because your lockups were also happenng
> when VirtualBox was running were they not ?
> 
> So, am going to try that again (the iperf test and simultaneous Win10
> in VirtualBox), but with SMT off, to see if I can reproduce it.
> 


I was doing the tests with bhyve, and the iperf tests were between VMs
on the same box.  That seems to trigger it fairly quickly. The Epyc took
a bit more work, but I could reliable do it there too.

	---Mike


-- 
-------------------
Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 x203
Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net
Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net
Cambridge, Ontario Canada



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?59b435cf-f4fb-0cc8-3bd0-0765ac0592da>