Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2018 11:54:47 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> To: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>, Ash Gokhale <ashfixit@gmail.com> Cc: josh@tcbug.org, Diane Bruce <db@db.net>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: net/viamillipede seeks commiter Message-ID: <5A9A2A97.5090401@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: <20180303044839.GA32429@home.opsec.eu> References: <CAHpe%2B0b6-nxm5o7kvvzVG=7zpo1mRU6ns7vWRUF750b8-qv2Hg@mail.gmail.com> <20180303044839.GA32429@home.opsec.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
03.03.2018 11:48, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Thanks, I tried to work on it. > > The suggested port does not install using poudriere. > > It uses > > .include <bsd.prog.mk> > > to get the install framework to install the program. This fails, > as bsd.prog.mk assumes that it is allowed to use chown/chgrp, which > is not the case while building under poudriere. And the program > itself does not really need to be installed to be owned by root. > > The error in poudriere is reported as this: > > ===> Generating temporary packing list > install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 viamillipede /wrkdirs/usr/ports/net/viamillipede/work/stage/usr/local/bin/viamillipede > install: /wrkdirs/usr/ports/net/viamillipede/work/stage/usr/local/bin/viamillipede: chown/chgrp: Operation not permitted > > Can you try to use a different approach and test it using poudriere ? Isn't it just a bug of poudriere's approach? There is nothing wrong in just using bsd.prog.mk.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5A9A2A97.5090401>