Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 01:27:32 +0200 From: Per von Zweigbergk <pvz@itassistans.se> To: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: HAST + ZFS self healing? Hot spares? Message-ID: <5B27EAAB-5D23-4844-B7C7-F83289BCABE7@itassistans.se> In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=1psNnEOFxD1YEmuNAHRDyXBdBfw@mail.gmail.com> References: <85EC77D3-116E-43B0-BFF1-AE1BD71B5CE9@itassistans.se> <20110519181436.GB2100@garage.freebsd.pl> <4DD5A1CF.70807@itassistans.se> <20110519230921.GF2100@garage.freebsd.pl> <BANLkTi=1psNnEOFxD1YEmuNAHRDyXBdBfw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
20 maj 2011 kl. 01.22 skrev Freddie Cash: > With HAST, there's only a couple of small changes needed: > - zpool offline poolname diskname <-- removes the /dev/hast = node from the pool What you're describing here is not what I asked about, activating a hot = spare drive without bringing down the HAST resource. You're describing taking the entire array offline while you perform work = on it. Which is fine in a lot of cases, but not exactly what I'd call = HA. :-)=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5B27EAAB-5D23-4844-B7C7-F83289BCABE7>