Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 16:13:01 -0700 From: "David Christensen" <davidch@broadcom.com> To: "Pete French" <petefrench@ticketswitch.com>, "d@delphij.net" <d@delphij.net> Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, "davidch@FreeBSD.ORG" <davidch@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: mini-HEADSUP bce owners: please test Message-ID: <5D267A3F22FD854F8F48B3D2B523819339DFEA2BC0@IRVEXCHCCR01.corp.ad.broadcom.com> In-Reply-To: <E1MBzV2-0003XZ-70@dilbert.ticketswitch.com> References: <4A26FF44.3040609@delphij.net> <E1MBzV2-0003XZ-70@dilbert.ticketswitch.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > David and I have committed some fixes to 7-STABLE tree, and I think=20 > > all important bce(4) fixes has been merged now. If you have bce(4)=20 > > interfaces PLEASE help us to test them, the simplest way of=20 > doing this=20 > > is to sync your code with RELENG_7 and rebuild kernel. [1] >=20 > I won't have timer to try this until friday at the earliest,=20 > but one question... is this likely to fix my infamous=20 > lagg/lacp issue ? I notice it isn't in the list of known=20 > issues. I will test anyway, but if you happen to be in that=20 > bit of code.... *does best winning smile* :-) That should be the packet length fix at line 5973 of if_bce.c. I did not test the teaming fix myself but another user provided a similar packet length fix which he claimed did fix the issue so I'm hopeful that this should work for you too. Dave
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5D267A3F22FD854F8F48B3D2B523819339DFEA2BC0>