Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:59:38 -0500 From: Derek Ragona <derek@computinginnovations.com> To: wc_fbsd@xxiii.com, freeBSD Questions <questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Pros and Cons of running under inetd.... Message-ID: <6.0.0.22.2.20060512165738.026575c0@mail.computinginnovations.com> In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.2.20060512163433.02e85298@mailsvr.xxiii.com> References: <4464B95D.1040702@computer.org> <20060512171515.GC34035@catflap.slightlystrange.org> <4464CEDA.80906@computer.org> <6.0.0.22.2.20060512152402.026a60c8@mail.computinginnovations.com> <6.2.3.4.2.20060512163433.02e85298@mailsvr.xxiii.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes it is still true today. The default system now has inetd running
nothing. And the ports now install rc scripts for these reasons.
For network daemons, when they are running in a listen mode there is no
real overhead on the system.
-Derek
At 03:41 PM 5/12/2006, wc_fbsd@xxiii.com wrote:
>At 04:25 PM 5/12/2006, you wrote:
>>inetd running is discouraged. Instead run the daemons on boot using rc
>>scripts. If you look back in the history, inetd running is a security
>>risk, and was discouraged in the 5.X releases.
>
>Is that still really true? Waaayyy back when, inetd would have all kinds
>of dangerous services enabled by default (allowing DOS stuff like spewing
>"chargen" into "discard").
>
>But that was a configuration issue, and issues with the services it
>launched; not with inetd itself.
>
>The authentication is still done within ftpd. You're just saving the tiny
>overhead of running it all the time for occasional use. And inetd does
>allow the tcpwrappers for anything it launches (obviously the wrappers are
>compiled into many other things now, ftpd included.)
>
> -Wayne
>
>_______________________________________________
>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
>--
>This message has been scanned for viruses and
>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>believed to be clean.
>MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.
>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.0.0.22.2.20060512165738.026575c0>