Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 08:46:34 -0500 From: Derek Ragona <derek@computinginnovations.com> To: Peter Boosten <peter@boosten.org>, Novembre <novembre@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: some problems after upgrading to 7.0-RELEASE Message-ID: <6.0.0.22.2.20080321084452.02701688@mail.computinginnovations.com> In-Reply-To: <47E33863.60103@boosten.org> References: <3b47caa90803201610i2a81448cwf06cc38245c3c132@mail.gmail.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20080320184859.026b36a8@mail.computinginnovations.com> <3b47caa90803202012rc963c89l7de5cb3dc827bd49@mail.gmail.com> <47E32CDB.3020009@boosten.org> <3b47caa90803202117x6498567fi6b37780297c8d728@mail.gmail.com> <47E33863.60103@boosten.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 11:24 PM 3/20/2008, Peter Boosten wrote:
>Novembre wrote:
>>I've read UPDATING before doing anything, but I assumed that "
>>portupgrade -faP " also covers that part about gnutls as well. Isn't
>>it true? Unless portupgrade did upgrade samba first and then gnutls,
>>which means it's not smart enough!
>>Am I wrong?
>
>Probably not :-)
>In my experience portupgrade -fa isn't always that smart.
>
>Peter
I followed all the UPDATING instructions, and still had many issues because
of old libraries. So the:
portupgrade -faP
didn't work well for me. I ended up rebuilding all the ports, which of
course fixed everything.
-Derek
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.0.0.22.2.20080321084452.02701688>