Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 14:23:39 -0500 From: Marty Landman <MLandman@face2interface.com> To: cpghost@cordula.ws, Gert Cuykens <gert.cuykens@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: inetd vs standalone daemon Message-ID: <6.2.0.14.0.20050327142159.03cc89f0@mail.face2interface.com> In-Reply-To: <20050327190511.GB15898@fw.farid-hajji.net> References: <ef60af0905032709464d9d12c3@mail.gmail.com> <20050327190511.GB15898@fw.farid-hajji.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 02:05 PM 3/27/2005, cpghost@cordula.ws wrote: >On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 07:46:09PM +0200, Gert Cuykens wrote: > > > I vote we get rid of inetd :) > >No. With inetd, you can also turn regular filters into network >aware programs (sort of). And not every network service is always >needed all the time. Having a deamon for each of those seldom used >services hanging around is just wastful. How much wasting is going on though? Can I get a good feel for resources consumed by looking at 'top'? I'm happy with my set up the way it is and am just asking in the hopes of learning more than I know (not very hard at this point). Marty Marty Landman, Face 2 Interface Inc. 845-679-9387 Search & Sort Easily: http://face2interface.com/Products/FormATable.shtml Web Installed Formmail: http://face2interface.com/formINSTal
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.2.0.14.0.20050327142159.03cc89f0>