Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 14:15:24 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ichwd fixes / patches Message-ID: <6.2.1.2.0.20050617141056.03ea3830@64.7.153.2> In-Reply-To: <867jj5wyvf.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <6.2.1.2.0.20050412220212.055c5d48@64.7.153.2> <867jj5wyvf.fsf@xps.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 04:23 AM 14/04/2005, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: >Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> writes: > > Any chance someone could champion / commit the fixes in > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dkern/79698 and perhaps MFC > > ? Its non functional right now and the patches provided there make it > > work once again. > >ichwd is mine... the PR originator sent me patches a couple of days >ago which I'll test. I have both ICH5 and ICH6 hardware to test on. Hi, Any chance to commit the patches in the above PR ? I know its not= =20 ideal, but at least it works where as its currently 100% broken in the tree. As to the issue of the ICH6 stuff, looking through the LINUX lists, it=20 seems a lot of ICH6 MBs dont actually hookup the onboard watchdog for some= =20 reason. ---Mike=20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.2.1.2.0.20050617141056.03ea3830>