Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 22:24:55 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: francisco@natserv.net Cc: FreeBSD Performance <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: SATA: RAID 5 controller recommendations Message-ID: <6.2.3.4.0.20051031222320.06601518@64.7.153.2> In-Reply-To: <20051031192143.V5132@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <000801c5d434$579de280$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <6.2.3.4.0.20051018234157.085cd7b8@64.7.153.2> <20051029001047.P43285@zoraida.natserv.net> <6.2.3.4.0.20051029001622.05bf16f8@64.7.153.2> <20051031192143.V5132@zoraida.natserv.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 07:23 PM 31/10/2005, Francisco Reyes wrote: >On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Mike Tancsa wrote: > >>> >>>>I use the 3ware line (8xxx) and they are very stable, but not the >>>>fastest. For speed, check out the cards from Areca. Native >>>>FreeBSD support and they are FAST >>>>http://www.areca.com.tw/products/html/pcix-sata.htm > >Saw a review last night of the Areca cards vs the latest 3ware. The >areca cards were about twice as fast, but the article says that they >are about twice as expensive (or something on that area). :-( Which 3ware were they comparing ? The 9500SX was a little bit more than the 4 port ARECA here in Canada. Still waiting for RAM so I can test. Hopefully later this week :( ---Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.2.3.4.0.20051031222320.06601518>