Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 17:39:34 +0900 From: itojun@itojun.org To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/4326 Message-ID: <6224.872066374@itojun.csl.sony.co.jp> In-Reply-To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)'s message of Wed, 20 Aug 1997 01:03:08 -0700 (PDT). <199708200803.BAA01014@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> References: <199708200803.BAA01014@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> * Could have been more maturely & succinctly articulated as: > * "SH added to /usr/share/mk/bsd.port.mk after 2.2.2 release, > * submitter presumed to be running 2.2.2 & not stable or current" >That completely misses the point. I have no patience for people who >waste our time because he can't be bothered to read the instructions >(it has been stated over and over that you need to update some stuff >if you are going to run the latest ports on a release system) or at >least take a look at the Makefile in question before submitting a >bogus PR. anyway, there should be a way to prevent bogus PRs. how about one of the followings: - timestamping (already rejected yesterday, I remember) - include latest bsd.port.mk into somewhere in /usr/ports (or somehow include bsd.port.mk to list of CVSup'ed files for collection "ports-all" ?) Then, we'll do # ln -s /usr/ports/somewhere/bsd.port.mk /usr/share/mk/bsd.port.mk itojun
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6224.872066374>