Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 17:15:18 +0200 From: Kristof Provost <kp@FreeBSD.org> To: Damien Fleuriot <ml@my.gd> Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, dfleuriot@hi-media.com, loos@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 10.3-STABLE - PF - possible regression in pf.conf set timeout interval Message-ID: <62ABBFDC-8662-48E5-A624-EAE609CDCBD0@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAE63ME4gNys9i_BnvFXw27QupTwQQomGGVnuiGQrza7jsQ_27A@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAE63ME4gNys9i_BnvFXw27QupTwQQomGGVnuiGQrza7jsQ_27A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 09 May 2016, at 16:58, Damien Fleuriot <ml@my.gd> wrote: >=20 > Since the upgrade, pf rules won't load anymore at boot time, nor even > manually with pfctl -f /etc/pf.conf : > # pfctl -f /etc/pf.conf > /etc/pf.conf:24: syntax error > pfctl: Syntax error in config file: pf rules not loaded >=20 > The problematic line is : > set timeout interval 10 >=20 I think that was broken by the commit which added ALTQ support for = CoDel. It made =E2=80=98interval=E2=80=99 a keyword, and it looks like that = breaks things for you. I=E2=80=99ve cced loos so he can take a look. Regards, Kristof=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?62ABBFDC-8662-48E5-A624-EAE609CDCBD0>