Date: Wed, 08 Sep 1999 20:48:50 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> To: jmutter@netwalk.com Cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Company offering FreeBSD on custom built servers. Message-ID: <6357.936848930@localhost> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 08 Sep 1999 23:07:44 EDT." <Pine.BSF.4.05.9909082304320.90727-100000@insomnia.local.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I though that people might find this interesting: > > http://www.rackspace.com/products/pricing.php3 What I find most "interesting" is the fact that their choice-box for "OS" says: "For optimum reliability, Rackspace reccommends RedHat Linux 5.2 as your operating system." What's *that* all about? What horror stories did they get for FreeBSD 3.2 that led to such a conclusion, and were any verified and/or experienced by this particular vendor. And if there weren't horror stories, then what else might be the motivation behind a statement like that? All interesting questions... In any case, not exactly a URL I'll be using for advocacy purposes until I find out. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6357.936848930>